BTCK vs IVV
7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTCK | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 0 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -2.36% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 3, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
BTCK vs IVV Performance
7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF (BTCK) is a ETF from Teucrium and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BTCK is down 2.36% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.4% for BTCK and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTCK charges 0.68% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTCK currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTCK or IVV?
BTCK has an expense ratio of 0.68% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTCK or IVV?
BTCK yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.