BTCK vs QQQ
7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTCK | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +8.80% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 3, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BTCK vs QQQ Performance
7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF (BTCK) is a ETF from Teucrium and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, BTCK is up 8.80% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.4% for BTCK and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTCK charges 0.68% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $18 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTCK currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTCK or QQQ?
BTCK has an expense ratio of 0.68% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $50 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTCK or QQQ?
BTCK yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.