BTCZ vs IVV
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTCZ | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $22M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -8.77% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.34% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 86.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -91.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
BTCZ vs IVV Performance
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) is a ETF from REX Shares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BTCZ returned +19.34% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, BTCZ is down 8.77% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BTCZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 86.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.1% for BTCZ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTCZ charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTCZ currently yields 0.01% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BTCZ and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTCZ or IVV?
BTCZ has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BTCZ or IVV?
Over the past year BTCZ returned +19.34% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BTCZ annualized -60.09% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BTCZ or IVV?
BTCZ has been the more volatile fund at 86.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BTCZ -91.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BTCZ and IVV?
BTCZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BTCZ and IVV?
BTCZ and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTCZ or IVV?
BTCZ yields 0.01% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.