BTCZ vs SCHD
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. BTCZ delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTCZ | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $23M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +39.85% | +26.21% | |
| 1Y Return | +118.82% | +29.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.73% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.67% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 83.6% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -91.1% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | Oct 20, 2011 |
BTCZ vs SCHD Performance
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) is a ETF from REX Shares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BTCZ returned +118.82% while SCHD returned +29.99%. Year to date, BTCZ is up 39.85% versus a gain of 26.21% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BTCZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 83.6% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.1% for BTCZ and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.14. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTCZ charges 0.95% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $6 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTCZ currently yields 0.01% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
BTCZ and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 101 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTCZ or SCHD?
BTCZ has an expense ratio of 0.95% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BTCZ or SCHD?
Over the past year BTCZ returned +118.82% vs +29.99% for SCHD, so BTCZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BTCZ annualized -51.51% vs +11.50% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BTCZ or SCHD?
BTCZ has been the more volatile fund at 83.6% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: BTCZ -91.1% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both BTCZ and SCHD?
BTCZ and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.14, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BTCZ and SCHD?
BTCZ and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 101 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTCZ or SCHD?
BTCZ yields 0.01% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.