BTCZ vs VXUS
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. BTCZ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTCZ | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $23M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +37.59% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +101.10% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 83.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -91.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BTCZ vs VXUS Performance
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) is a ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BTCZ returned +101.10% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, BTCZ is up 37.59% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BTCZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 83.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.1% for BTCZ and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.09. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTCZ charges 0.95% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $5 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTCZ currently yields 0.01% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BTCZ and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTCZ or VXUS?
BTCZ has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BTCZ or VXUS?
Over the past year BTCZ returned +101.10% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so BTCZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BTCZ annualized -52.02% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BTCZ or VXUS?
BTCZ has been the more volatile fund at 83.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BTCZ -91.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BTCZ and VXUS?
BTCZ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.09, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BTCZ and VXUS?
BTCZ and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTCZ or VXUS?
BTCZ yields 0.01% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.