BTR vs QQQ
Beacon Tactical Risk ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.08% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $33M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.18% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 12 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +11.48% | +17.85% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.71% | +26.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.55% | +26.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.16% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Beacon Capital Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 17, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BTR vs QQQ Performance
Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) is a ETF from Beacon Capital Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BTR returned +18.71% while QQQ returned +26.45%. Year to date, BTR is up 11.48% versus a gain of 17.85% for QQQ.
Over three years, BTR compounded at +5.55% per year against +26.07% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.09% annualized vs +4.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 11.3% for BTR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for BTR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTR charges 1.08% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $108 vs $18 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTR currently yields 1.18% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BTR and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 110 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTR or QQQ?
BTR has an expense ratio of 1.08% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BTR or QQQ?
Over the past year BTR returned +18.71% vs +26.45% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BTR annualized +4.88% vs +13.09% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BTR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 11.3% for BTR. Worst drawdown: BTR -16.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BTR and QQQ?
BTR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BTR and QQQ?
BTR and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 110 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTR or QQQ?
BTR yields 1.18% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so BTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.