BTT vs IVV
BlackRock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BTT or IVV?
Municipal Bond against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTT | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.34% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.6B | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.28% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 557 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -0.27% | +12.70%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.49% | +19.36%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.20% | +21.16%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.27% | +12.75%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2%Best | 14.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.0% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,866 | $18,221Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity |
| Style | Municipal Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 29, 2012 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 29, 2012 to Sep 8, 2026 (14 years).
BTT vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BTT vs IVV Performance
BlackRock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust (BTT) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BTT returned +1.49% while IVV returned +19.36%. Year to date, BTT is down 0.27% versus a gain of 12.70% for IVV.
Over three years, BTT compounded at +6.20% per year against +21.16% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -0.27% and +12.75% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.41% annualized vs +0.35%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 10.2% for BTT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.0% for BTT and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTT charges 1.34% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $134 vs $3 annually, a gap of $131 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTT currently yields 2.28% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 125 holdings in BTT and 504 in IVV, totalling 48.6% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 186 days apart, BTT as of Jan 31, 2026 and IVV as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 125 positions we hold weights for in BTT and 504 in IVV, against full books of 557 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BTT and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTT or IVV?
BTT has an expense ratio of 1.34% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $131 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BTT or IVV?
Over the past year BTT returned +1.49% vs +19.36% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), BTT annualized +0.35% vs +13.41% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BTT or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 10.2% for BTT. Worst drawdown: BTT -35.0% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both BTT and IVV?
BTT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTT or IVV?
BTT yields 2.28% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BTT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BTT?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.