BUFP vs PMAR

BUFP vs PMAR

Which is better, BUFP or PMAR?

Nearly the same fund. BUFP costs less.

BUFP has a lower expense ratio. BUFP led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97.

Lower Fees: BUFPHigher Returns: BUFP

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBUFPPMAR
Expense Ratio0.50%Best0.79%
AUM$279M$751M
Dividend Yield0.01%0.00%
Holdings2818
YTD Return+9.90%Best+9.25%
1Y Return+12.90%Best+12.02%
3Y Return (annualized)-+13.17%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.63%
Volatility (annualized)6.0%5.2%Best
Max Drawdown-12.0%-9.3%Best
$10,000 over 2.3 years$13,136Best$12,946
Fund FamilyPGIM InvestmentsInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionJun 11, 2024Mar 2, 2020

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 13, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).

BUFP vs PMAR growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.

Compare BUFP against instead:BUFP vs SPYBUFP vs QQQBUFP vs VOOBUFP vs VTIPMAR against:PMAR vs VXUS

BUFP vs PMAR Performance

PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year BUFP returned +12.90% while PMAR returned +12.02%. Year to date, BUFP is up 9.90% versus a gain of 9.25% for PMAR.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BUFP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.0% compared with 5.2% for PMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.0% for BUFP and -9.3% for PMAR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BUFP charges 0.50% per year while PMAR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $79 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFP currently yields 0.01% against 0.00% for PMAR.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BUFP and PMAR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BUFPPMAR

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BUFP or PMAR?

BUFP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while PMAR charges 0.79%. BUFP is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BUFP or PMAR?

Over the past year BUFP returned +12.90% vs +12.02% for PMAR, so BUFP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BUFP annualized +12.59% vs +11.88% for PMAR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BUFP or PMAR?

BUFP has been the more volatile fund at 6.0% annualized versus 5.2% for PMAR. Worst drawdown: BUFP -12.0% vs PMAR -9.3%.

Should I hold both BUFP and PMAR?

BUFP and PMAR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BUFP or PMAR?

BUFP yields 0.01% while PMAR yields 0.00%, so BUFP currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PMAR better than BUFP?

BUFP has a lower expense ratio. BUFP led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.