BUFP vs VOO
BUFP vs VOO
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUFP | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $223M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 15 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +8.63% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.52% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BUFP vs VOO Performance
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) is a ETF from PGIM Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BUFP returned +14.52% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, BUFP is up 8.63% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 6.2% for BUFP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.0% for BUFP and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUFP charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFP currently yields 0.01% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BUFP and VOO share 0 holdings out of 517 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUFP or VOO?
BUFP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BUFP or VOO?
Over the past year BUFP returned +14.52% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BUFP annualized +13.14% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BUFP or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 6.2% for BUFP. Worst drawdown: BUFP -12.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BUFP and VOO?
BUFP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BUFP and VOO?
BUFP and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 517 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUFP or VOO?
BUFP yields 0.01% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.