BUFQ vs OVQ
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF vs Overlay Shares Nasdaq 100 Income ETF
Which is better, BUFQ or OVQ?
OVQ costs less.
OVQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUFQ | OVQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.97%Best |
| AUM | $1.7B | $33M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 15 | 2 |
| YTD Return | +8.52%Best | -3.77% |
| 1Y Return | +11.06% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.98% | - |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Overlay Shares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2022 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BUFQ vs OVQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BUFQ vs OVQ Performance
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Overlay Shares Nasdaq 100 Income ETF (OVQ) is an ETF from Overlay Shares. Year to date, BUFQ is up 8.52% versus a loss of 3.77% for OVQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUFQ charges 1.00% per year while OVQ charges 0.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $97 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFQ currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for OVQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 4 holdings in BUFQ and 2 in OVQ, totalling 100.0% and 100.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 4 positions we hold weights for in BUFQ and 2 in OVQ, against full books of 15 and 2.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 4 and 2 positions we hold weights for.
BUFQ holds 4 positions OVQ does not, 100.0% of the fund.
Largest: QMAR 25.40%, QDEC 25.15%, QSPT 24.84%, FEMB 24.58%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUFQ and OVQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUFQ or OVQ?
BUFQ has an expense ratio of 1.00% while OVQ charges 0.97%. OVQ is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUFQ or OVQ?
BUFQ yields 0.00% while OVQ yields 0.00%, so OVQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OVQ better than BUFQ?
OVQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.