BUFQ vs QDTY
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF vs YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
Which is better, BUFQ or QDTY?
QDTY has been ahead.
BUFQ has a lower expense ratio. QDTY led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUFQ | QDTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00%Best | 1.17% |
| AUM | $1.7B | $28M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 36.64% |
| Holdings | 10 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +13.85% | +15.73%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.09% | +21.15%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.83% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9%Best | 19.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7%Best | -20.2% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $12,626 | $14,403Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | YieldMax ETF |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2022 | Feb 12, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 13, 2025 to Oct 13, 2026 (1.7 years).
BUFQ vs QDTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
BUFQ vs QDTY Performance
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year BUFQ returned +17.09% while QDTY returned +21.15%. Year to date, BUFQ is up 13.85% versus a gain of 15.73% for QDTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QDTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.0% compared with 9.9% for BUFQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for BUFQ and -20.2% for QDTY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUFQ charges 1.00% per year while QDTY charges 1.17%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $117 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFQ currently yields 0.00% against 36.64% for QDTY.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 4 holdings in BUFQ and 1 in QDTY, totalling 100.0% and 0.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 4 positions we hold weights for in BUFQ and 1 in QDTY, against full books of 10 and 10.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUFQ and QDTY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUFQ or QDTY?
BUFQ has an expense ratio of 1.00% while QDTY charges 1.17%. BUFQ is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUFQ or QDTY?
Over the past year BUFQ returned +17.09% vs +21.15% for QDTY, so QDTY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BUFQ annualized +14.70% vs +23.94% for QDTY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUFQ or QDTY?
QDTY has been the more volatile fund at 19.0% annualized versus 9.9% for BUFQ. Worst drawdown: BUFQ -15.7% vs QDTY -20.2%.
Should I hold both BUFQ and QDTY?
BUFQ and QDTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUFQ or QDTY?
BUFQ yields 0.00% while QDTY yields 36.64%, so QDTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QDTY better than BUFQ?
BUFQ has a lower expense ratio. QDTY led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.