BUI vs PSIL
BlackRock Utility Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust vs ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF
Which is better, BUI or PSIL?
Each has led over a different period.
PSIL has a lower expense ratio. BUI led over 5Y and the full window, PSIL over 1Y and 3Y. BUI is less concentrated, with 39.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUI | PSIL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 1.00%Best |
| AUM | $687M | $44M |
| Dividend Yield | 10.99% | 7.45% |
| Holdings | 54 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +2.96% | +19.42%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.13% | +9.88%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.03% | +15.22%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.58%Best | -23.31% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.7%Best | 49.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.4%Best | -92.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,410Best | $2,653 |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.6%Best | 64.2% |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 23, 2011 | Sep 15, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2021 to Oct 15, 2026 (5.1 years).
BUI vs PSIL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.1 years both funds cover.
BUI vs PSIL Performance
BlackRock Utility Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust (BUI) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF (PSIL) is an ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year BUI returned +4.13% while PSIL returned +9.88%. Year to date, BUI is up 2.96% versus a gain of 19.42% for PSIL.
Over three years, BUI compounded at +15.03% per year against +15.22% for PSIL; over five years the annualized figures are +7.58% and -23.31% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 49.0% compared with 18.7% for BUI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.4% for BUI and -92.7% for PSIL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUI charges 1.07% per year while PSIL charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $100 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUI currently yields 10.99% against 7.45% for PSIL.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 54 holdings in BUI and 29 in PSIL, totalling 101.1% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 94 days apart, BUI as of Jun 30, 2026 and PSIL as of Oct 2, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in BUI and 29 in PSIL, against full books of 54 and 33.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 19 positions for PSIL that do not appear in our book for BUI (62.6% of the fund), and 32 for BUI that do not appear in PSIL (69.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUI and PSIL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUI or PSIL?
BUI has an expense ratio of 1.07% while PSIL charges 1.00%. PSIL is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUI or PSIL?
Over the past year BUI returned +4.13% vs +9.88% for PSIL, so PSIL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUI or PSIL?
PSIL has been the more volatile fund at 49.0% annualized versus 18.7% for BUI. Worst drawdown: BUI -27.4% vs PSIL -92.7%.
Should I hold both BUI and PSIL?
BUI and PSIL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUI or PSIL?
BUI yields 10.99% while PSIL yields 7.45%, so BUI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PSIL better than BUI?
PSIL has a lower expense ratio. BUI led over 5Y and the full window, PSIL over 1Y and 3Y. BUI is less concentrated, with 39.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.