BUI vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBUIIVVWinner
Expense Ratio1.07%0.03%
AUM$732M$865.2B
Dividend Yield9.56%1.09%
Holdings52508
YTD Return+7.81%+13.80%
1Y Return+11.13%+23.70%
3Y Return (annualized)+15.70%+21.49%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.13%+13.43%
Volatility (annualized)16.6%15.1%
Max Drawdown-48.3%-56.5%
Fund FamilyBlackRock, Inc. (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionNov 23, 2011May 15, 2000

BUI vs IVV Performance

BlackRock Utility Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust (BUI) is a ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BUI returned +11.13% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, BUI is up 7.81% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.

Over three years, BUI compounded at +15.70% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.13% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +4.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BUI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.3% for BUI and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BUI charges 1.07% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUI currently yields 9.56% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

2.7%overlap

BUI and IVV share 24 holdings out of 533 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.7% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BUIWeight in IVVDifference
NEE7.30%0.28%7.02%
WMB4.18%0.14%4.04%
DUK4.12%0.15%3.97%
SOProProPro
UNPProProPro
AEPProProPro
TRGPProProPro
SREProProPro
ETRProProPro
DProProPro
See all 10 holdings BUI shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BUI or IVV?

BUI has an expense ratio of 1.07% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.

Which performed better, BUI or IVV?

Over the past year BUI returned +11.13% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), BUI annualized +4.78% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, BUI or IVV?

BUI has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BUI -48.3% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both BUI and IVV?

BUI and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between BUI and IVV?

BUI and IVV share 24 common holdings with a 2.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 533 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, BUI or IVV?

BUI yields 9.56% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BUI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →