BWEB vs VTI
BWEB vs VTI
Bitwise Web3 ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BWEB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BWEB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 41 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +6.19% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.14% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +35.54% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Bitwise | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 3, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
BWEB vs VTI Performance
Bitwise Web3 ETF (BWEB) is a ETF from Bitwise and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BWEB returned +31.14% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, BWEB is up 6.19% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, BWEB compounded at +35.54% per year against +21.12% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, BWEB has the edge at +33.63% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BWEB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.7% for BWEB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BWEB charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BWEB currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BWEB and VTI share 23 holdings out of 2800 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BWEB | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| COIN | 8.59% | 0.04% | 8.55% |
| META | 6.93% | 1.70% | 5.23% |
| NVDA | 1.45% | 6.32% | 4.87% |
| CRCL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| RBLX | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MSFT | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| EQIX | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| HOOD | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| NET | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings BWEB shares with VTI Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. X-ray my whole portfolio$99/yr Pro · 7-day refund | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BWEB or VTI?
BWEB has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BWEB or VTI?
Over the past year BWEB returned +31.14% vs +24.16% for VTI, so BWEB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BWEB annualized +33.63% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BWEB or VTI?
BWEB has been the more volatile fund at 35.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BWEB -33.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BWEB and VTI?
BWEB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BWEB and VTI?
BWEB and VTI share 23 common holdings with a 8.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2800 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BWEB or VTI?
BWEB yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.