CAFG vs QQQ
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. CAFG delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CAFG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $48M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.30% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +31.26% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.49% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.25% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 1, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CAFG vs QQQ Performance
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CAFG returned +32.49% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, CAFG is up 31.26% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, CAFG compounded at +16.25% per year against +25.96% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, CAFG has the edge at +17.64% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.1% for CAFG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.7% for CAFG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CAFG charges 0.59% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $18 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CAFG currently yields 0.30% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CAFG and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 203 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CAFG or QQQ?
CAFG has an expense ratio of 0.59% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CAFG or QQQ?
Over the past year CAFG returned +32.49% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so CAFG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), CAFG annualized +17.64% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CAFG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.1% for CAFG. Worst drawdown: CAFG -23.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CAFG and QQQ?
CAFG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CAFG and QQQ?
CAFG and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 203 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CAFG or QQQ?
CAFG yields 0.30% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.