CAFG vs VTI
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CAFG or VTI?
Small Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CAFG led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CAFG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $45M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.31% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 102 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +27.67%Best | +12.57% |
| 1Y Return | +24.73%Best | +17.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.58% | +20.87%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.9% | 13.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.7% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $16,729 | $19,433Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 1, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 2, 2023 to Sep 11, 2026 (3.4 years).
CAFG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
CAFG vs VTI Performance
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CAFG returned +24.73% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, CAFG is up 27.67% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Over three years, CAFG compounded at +15.58% per year against +20.87% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CAFG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.9% compared with 13.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.7% for CAFG and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CAFG charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CAFG currently yields 0.31% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 73.9% of CAFG's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of CAFG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
71 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in CAFG and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 102 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CAFG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| IRDMIridium Communications Inc | 4.45% | 0.00% | 4.45% |
| LQDALiquidia Technologies Inc | 2.75% | 0.00% | 2.75% |
| POWIPower Integrations Inc | 2.75% | 0.00% | 2.75% |
| ADEAAdeia Inc. | 2.65% | 0.00% | 2.65% |
| POWLPowell Industries Inc | 2.58% | 0.01% | 2.57% |
| RNGRingcentral Inc, Class A | 2.43% | 0.00% | 2.43% |
| AMNAmn Healthcare Services Inc | 2.08% | 0.00% | 2.08% |
| ATENA10 Networks Inc | 1.89% | 0.00% | 1.89% |
| PBIPitney Bowes Inc | 1.84% | 0.00% | 1.84% |
| DGIIDigi International Inc | 1.75% | 0.00% | 1.75% |
73.9% of CAFG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CAFG or VTI?
CAFG has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CAFG or VTI?
Over the past year CAFG returned +24.73% vs +17.22% for VTI, so CAFG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CAFG or VTI?
CAFG has been the more volatile fund at 17.9% annualized versus 13.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CAFG -23.7% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both CAFG and VTI?
CAFG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CAFG and VTI?
At least 73.9% of CAFG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 71 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in CAFG and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, CAFG or VTI?
CAFG yields 0.31% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CAFG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CAFG led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.