CAFG vs VOO
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. CAFG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CAFG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $48M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.30% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +31.79% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.87% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.49% | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 1, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CAFG vs VOO Performance
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CAFG returned +32.87% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, CAFG is up 31.79% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Over three years, CAFG compounded at +16.49% per year against +22.09% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, CAFG has the edge at +17.83% annualized vs +13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CAFG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.7% for CAFG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CAFG charges 0.59% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CAFG currently yields 0.30% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
CAFG and VOO share 0 holdings out of 606 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CAFG or VOO?
CAFG has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CAFG or VOO?
Over the past year CAFG returned +32.87% vs +20.69% for VOO, so CAFG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), CAFG annualized +17.83% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CAFG or VOO?
CAFG has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CAFG -23.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CAFG and VOO?
CAFG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CAFG and VOO?
CAFG and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 606 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CAFG or VOO?
CAFG yields 0.30% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.