CBSE vs VTI
Clough Select Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CBSE delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CBSE | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.86% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $53M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.26% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 39 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.78% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +47.62% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.66% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Changebridge Capital | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
CBSE vs VTI Performance
Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) is a ETF from Changebridge Capital and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CBSE returned +47.62% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, CBSE is up 5.78% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, CBSE compounded at +12.66% per year against +21.17% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, CBSE has the edge at +14.85% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CBSE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.3% for CBSE and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CBSE charges 0.86% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $86 vs $3 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CBSE currently yields 0.26% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CBSE and VTI share 30 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CBSE or VTI?
CBSE has an expense ratio of 0.86% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $83 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CBSE or VTI?
Over the past year CBSE returned +47.62% vs +23.31% for VTI, so CBSE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CBSE annualized +14.85% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CBSE or VTI?
CBSE has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CBSE -36.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CBSE and VTI?
CBSE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CBSE and VTI?
CBSE and VTI share 30 common holdings with a 3.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CBSE or VTI?
CBSE yields 0.26% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.