CBTJ vs SPY
Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Which is better, CBTJ or SPY?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CBTJ | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.09%Best |
| AUM | $25M | $804.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.77% | 0.98% |
| Holdings | 7 | 505 |
| YTD Return | -13.77% | +12.22%Best |
| 1Y Return | -31.99% | +16.97%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.16% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.00% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.4% | 13.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -42.4% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $7,860 | $12,858Best |
| Fund Family | Calamos Investments | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 4, 2025 | Jan 22, 1993 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 4, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.6 years).
CBTJ vs SPY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
CBTJ vs SPY Performance
Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ) is an ETF from Calamos Investments and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year CBTJ returned -31.99% while SPY returned +16.97%. Year to date, CBTJ is down 13.77% versus a gain of 12.22% for SPY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CBTJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.4% compared with 13.1% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.4% for CBTJ and -18.8% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CBTJ charges 0.69% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $9 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CBTJ currently yields 1.77% against 0.98% for SPY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CBTJ and SPY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CBTJ or SPY?
CBTJ has an expense ratio of 0.69% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CBTJ or SPY?
Over the past year CBTJ returned -31.99% vs +16.97% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CBTJ annualized -13.97% vs +17.01% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CBTJ or SPY?
CBTJ has been the more volatile fund at 24.4% annualized versus 13.1% for SPY. Worst drawdown: CBTJ -42.4% vs SPY -18.8%.
Should I hold both CBTJ and SPY?
CBTJ and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CBTJ or SPY?
CBTJ yields 1.77% while SPY yields 0.98%, so CBTJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPY better than CBTJ?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.