CBTJ vs VTI
Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CBTJ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $24M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.77% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -15.87% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | -32.85% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Calamos Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 4, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
CBTJ vs VTI Performance
Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ) is a ETF from Calamos Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CBTJ returned -32.85% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, CBTJ is down 15.87% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CBTJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.4% for CBTJ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CBTJ charges 0.69% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CBTJ currently yields 1.77% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CBTJ or VTI?
CBTJ has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CBTJ or VTI?
Over the past year CBTJ returned -32.85% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CBTJ annualized -15.97% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CBTJ or VTI?
CBTJ has been the more volatile fund at 23.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CBTJ -42.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CBTJ and VTI?
CBTJ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, CBTJ or VTI?
CBTJ yields 1.77% while VTI yields 1.07%, so CBTJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.