CCOM vs IVV
Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCOM | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $99M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.26% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -4.39% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -7.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Simplify Exchange Traded Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
CCOM vs IVV Performance
Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM) is a ETF from Simplify Exchange Traded Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, CCOM is down 4.39% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.4% for CCOM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCOM charges 0.99% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCOM currently yields 1.26% against 1.09% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCOM or IVV?
CCOM has an expense ratio of 0.99% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCOM or IVV?
CCOM yields 1.26% while IVV yields 1.09%, so CCOM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.