CCOM vs VYM
Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCOM | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $99M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.26% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -5.05% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -7.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Simplify Exchange Traded Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
CCOM vs VYM Performance
Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM) is a ETF from Simplify Exchange Traded Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, CCOM is down 5.05% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.4% for CCOM and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCOM charges 0.99% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $4 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCOM currently yields 1.26% against 2.86% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCOM or VYM?
CCOM has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $95 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCOM or VYM?
CCOM yields 1.26% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.