CCOM vs VOO
Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCOM | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $99M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.26% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -5.05% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -7.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Simplify Exchange Traded Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CCOM vs VOO Performance
Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM) is a ETF from Simplify Exchange Traded Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, CCOM is down 5.05% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.4% for CCOM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCOM charges 0.99% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCOM currently yields 1.26% against 1.09% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCOM or VOO?
CCOM has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCOM or VOO?
CCOM yields 1.26% while VOO yields 1.09%, so CCOM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.