CGGO vs VXUS
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. CGGO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGGO | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $12.0B | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.02% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 119 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +15.39% | +14.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.57% | +25.40% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.95% | +20.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.76% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CGGO vs VXUS Performance
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGGO returned +25.57% while VXUS returned +25.40%. Year to date, CGGO is up 15.39% versus a gain of 14.26% for VXUS.
Over three years, CGGO compounded at +20.95% per year against +20.47% for VXUS. Across the full 5-year window we track, CGGO has the edge at +13.23% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGGO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.9% for CGGO and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGGO charges 0.47% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $5 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGGO currently yields 1.02% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CGGO and VXUS share 35 holdings out of 7939 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGGO or VXUS?
CGGO has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGGO or VXUS?
Over the past year CGGO returned +25.57% vs +25.40% for VXUS, so CGGO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), CGGO annualized +13.23% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGGO or VXUS?
CGGO has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: CGGO -24.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CGGO and VXUS?
CGGO and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CGGO and VXUS?
CGGO and VXUS share 35 common holdings with a 5.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7939 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGGO or VXUS?
CGGO yields 1.02% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.