CGGO vs VTI
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CGGO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGGO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $12.0B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.02% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 119 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +16.02% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.87% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.20% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
CGGO vs VTI Performance
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGGO returned +26.87% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, CGGO is up 16.02% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, CGGO compounded at +21.20% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, CGGO has the edge at +13.35% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGGO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.9% for CGGO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGGO charges 0.47% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGGO currently yields 1.02% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CGGO and VTI share 49 holdings out of 2843 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGGO or VTI?
CGGO has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGGO or VTI?
Over the past year CGGO returned +26.87% vs +22.35% for VTI, so CGGO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), CGGO annualized +13.35% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGGO or VTI?
CGGO has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CGGO -24.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CGGO and VTI?
CGGO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between CGGO and VTI?
CGGO and VTI share 49 common holdings with a 22.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2843 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGGO or VTI?
CGGO yields 1.02% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.