CGPT vs IVV
VegaShares AI Inference ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CGPT or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGPT | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 12 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -10.22% | +11.03%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.62% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.61% |
| Fund Family | VegaShares ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 13, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CGPT vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CGPT vs IVV Performance
VegaShares AI Inference ETF (CGPT) is an ETF from VegaShares ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, CGPT is down 10.22% versus a gain of 11.03% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGPT charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGPT currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 13.8% of IVV's money is in holdings CGPT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for CGPT, our book for it covers 76.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and CGPT share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in CGPT and 490 in IVV, against full books of 12 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CGPT and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGPT or IVV?
CGPT has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between CGPT and IVV?
At least 13.8% of IVV's money is in holdings CGPT also owns. Our book for CGPT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in CGPT and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGPT or IVV?
CGPT yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CGPT?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.