CGPT vs QQQ
VegaShares AI Inference ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, CGPT or QQQ?
QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGPT | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $987,728.82 | $437.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 47 | 208 |
| YTD Return | -25.12% | +12.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +11.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.74% |
| Fund Family | VegaShares ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 13, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CGPT vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CGPT vs QQQ Performance
VegaShares AI Inference ETF (CGPT) is an ETF from VegaShares ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, CGPT is down 25.12% versus a gain of 12.98% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGPT charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGPT currently yields 0.00% against 0.43% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 20.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings CGPT also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for CGPT, our book for it lists positions totalling 110.4% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
QQQ and CGPT share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in CGPT and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 47 and 208.
20.1% of QQQ is already inside CGPT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGPT or QQQ?
CGPT has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between CGPT and QQQ?
At least 20.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings CGPT also owns. Our book for CGPT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in CGPT and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGPT or QQQ?
CGPT yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than CGPT?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.