CGUS vs NTSX
Capital Group Core Equity ETF vs WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund
Which is better, CGUS or NTSX?
Nearly the same fund. NTSX costs less.
NTSX has a lower expense ratio. CGUS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGUS | NTSX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 0.22%Best |
| AUM | $12.3B | $1.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.82% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 68 | 1,418 |
| YTD Return | +10.06%Best | +7.09% |
| 1Y Return | +12.06%Best | +8.42% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.71%Best | +18.03% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.09% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6%Best | 16.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.9%Best | -26.2% |
| $10,000 over 4.7 years | $18,796Best | $15,678 |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | Aug 2, 2018 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Nov 13, 2026 (4.7 years).
CGUS vs NTSX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.7 years both funds cover.
CGUS vs NTSX Performance
Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year CGUS returned +12.06% while NTSX returned +8.42%. Year to date, CGUS is up 10.06% versus a gain of 7.09% for NTSX.
Over three years, CGUS compounded at +19.71% per year against +18.03% for NTSX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NTSX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 14.6% for CGUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.9% for CGUS and -26.2% for NTSX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGUS charges 0.33% per year while NTSX charges 0.22%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $22 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGUS currently yields 0.82% against 1.07% for NTSX.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CGUS and NTSX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGUS or NTSX?
CGUS has an expense ratio of 0.33% while NTSX charges 0.22%. NTSX is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGUS or NTSX?
Over the past year CGUS returned +12.06% vs +8.42% for NTSX, so CGUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGUS or NTSX?
NTSX has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 14.6% for CGUS. Worst drawdown: CGUS -21.9% vs NTSX -26.2%.
Should I hold both CGUS and NTSX?
CGUS and NTSX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGUS or NTSX?
CGUS yields 0.82% while NTSX yields 1.07%, so NTSX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NTSX better than CGUS?
NTSX has a lower expense ratio. CGUS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.