CGV vs SCHD
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGV | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.25% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $129M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.86% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 90 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +11.48% | +26.21% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.37% | +29.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.74% | +15.73% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.67% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Conductor ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2016 | Oct 20, 2011 |
CGV vs SCHD Performance
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV) is a ETF from Conductor ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year CGV returned +19.37% while SCHD returned +29.99%. Year to date, CGV is up 11.48% versus a gain of 26.21% for SCHD.
Over three years, CGV compounded at +12.74% per year against +15.73% for SCHD. Across the full 4-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.50% annualized vs +9.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 13.4% for CGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for CGV and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGV charges 1.25% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $125 vs $6 annually, a gap of $119 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGV currently yields 4.86% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
CGV and SCHD share 1 holdings out of 178 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGV | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| APA | 1.63% | 0.33% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGV or SCHD?
CGV has an expense ratio of 1.25% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $119 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGV or SCHD?
Over the past year CGV returned +19.37% vs +29.99% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CGV annualized +9.85% vs +11.50% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGV or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 13.4% for CGV. Worst drawdown: CGV -16.6% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both CGV and SCHD?
CGV and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CGV and SCHD?
CGV and SCHD share 1 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 178 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGV or SCHD?
CGV yields 4.86% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so CGV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.