CGV vs SCHD
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, CGV or SCHD?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. CGV is less concentrated, with 21.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGV | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.25% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $135M | $112.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.87% | 3.13% |
| Holdings | 82 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +12.79% | +28.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.63% | +31.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.12% | +16.70%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.09% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3%Best | 14.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6% | -16.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.1 years | $14,792 | $16,368Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 21.2%Best | 41.5% |
| Fund Family | Conductor ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2016 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 1, 2022 to Sep 3, 2026 (4.1 years).
CGV vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.
CGV vs SCHD Performance
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV) is an ETF from Conductor ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year CGV returned +19.63% while SCHD returned +31.77%. Year to date, CGV is up 12.79% versus a gain of 28.59% for SCHD.
Over three years, CGV compounded at +13.12% per year against +16.70% for SCHD. Across the full 4-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +12.77% annualized vs +10.02%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.3% for CGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for CGV and -16.1% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGV charges 1.25% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $125 vs $6 annually, a gap of $119 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGV currently yields 4.87% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
1.4% of CGV's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 0.3% of SCHD's money is in holdings CGV also owns.
CGV and SCHD share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in CGV and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 82 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 98 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for CGV (99.6% of the fund), and 13 for CGV that do not appear in SCHD (16.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGV | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| APAApa Corp | 1.38% | 0.33% | 1.05% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CGV and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGV or SCHD?
CGV has an expense ratio of 1.25% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $119 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGV or SCHD?
Over the past year CGV returned +19.63% vs +31.77% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CGV annualized +10.02% vs +12.77% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGV or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.3% for CGV. Worst drawdown: CGV -16.6% vs SCHD -16.1%.
Should I hold both CGV and SCHD?
CGV and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGV and SCHD?
1.4% of CGV's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 0.3% of SCHD's is in holdings CGV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in CGV and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGV or SCHD?
CGV yields 4.87% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so CGV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than CGV?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. CGV is less concentrated, with 21.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.