CGV vs VXUS
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.25% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $129M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.86% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 90 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +11.48% | +15.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.37% | +26.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.74% | +19.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Conductor ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2016 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CGV vs VXUS Performance
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV) is a ETF from Conductor ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGV returned +19.37% while VXUS returned +26.32%. Year to date, CGV is up 11.48% versus a gain of 15.24% for VXUS.
Over three years, CGV compounded at +12.74% per year against +19.85% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, CGV has the edge at +9.85% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.4% for CGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for CGV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGV charges 1.25% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $125 vs $5 annually, a gap of $120 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGV currently yields 4.86% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CGV and VXUS share 55 holdings out of 7885 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGV or VXUS?
CGV has an expense ratio of 1.25% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $120 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGV or VXUS?
Over the past year CGV returned +19.37% vs +26.32% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CGV annualized +9.85% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGV or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.4% for CGV. Worst drawdown: CGV -16.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CGV and VXUS?
CGV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CGV and VXUS?
CGV and VXUS share 55 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7885 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGV or VXUS?
CGV yields 4.86% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so CGV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.