CGXU vs IVV
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CGXU delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGXU | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6.6B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.10% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 73 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +17.60% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.44% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.43% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
CGXU vs IVV Performance
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CGXU returned +33.44% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, CGXU is up 17.60% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, CGXU compounded at +19.43% per year against +22.08% for IVV. Across the full 5-year window we track, CGXU has the edge at +10.62% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGXU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.6% for CGXU and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGXU charges 0.54% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $3 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGXU currently yields 5.10% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CGXU and IVV share 0 holdings out of 582 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGXU or IVV?
CGXU has an expense ratio of 0.54% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGXU or IVV?
Over the past year CGXU returned +33.44% vs +21.89% for IVV, so CGXU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), CGXU annualized +10.62% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGXU or IVV?
CGXU has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CGXU -25.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CGXU and IVV?
CGXU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CGXU and IVV?
CGXU and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 582 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGXU or IVV?
CGXU yields 5.10% while IVV yields 1.10%, so CGXU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.