CGXU vs VTI
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CGXU or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CGXU led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGXU | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $6.7B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.10% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 181 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +17.10%Best | +13.60% |
| 1Y Return | +26.50%Best | +18.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.83% | +23.04%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 15.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.6% | -22.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $15,685 | $18,725Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.0% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Sep 25, 2026 (4.6 years).
CGXU vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
CGXU vs VTI Performance
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGXU returned +26.50% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, CGXU is up 17.10% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Over three years, CGXU compounded at +20.83% per year against +23.04% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGXU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 15.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.6% for CGXU and -22.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGXU charges 0.54% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $3 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGXU currently yields 5.10% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 77 holdings in CGXU and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 99.7% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 77 positions we hold weights for in CGXU and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 181 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for CGXU (97.5% of the fund), and 8 for CGXU that do not appear in VTI (10.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CGXU and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGXU or VTI?
CGXU has an expense ratio of 0.54% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGXU or VTI?
Over the past year CGXU returned +26.50% vs +18.17% for VTI, so CGXU leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGXU or VTI?
CGXU has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 15.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CGXU -25.6% vs VTI -22.4%.
Should I hold both CGXU and VTI?
CGXU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGXU or VTI?
CGXU yields 5.10% while VTI yields 1.03%, so CGXU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CGXU?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CGXU led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.