CLSM vs VTI
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CLSM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLSM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.82% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $100M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.79% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +17.37% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.69% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.80% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.58% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | The Cabana Group, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 12, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
CLSM vs VTI Performance
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) is a ETF from The Cabana Group, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CLSM returned +24.69% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, CLSM is up 17.37% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, CLSM compounded at +13.80% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.58% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +3.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.4% for CLSM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.8% for CLSM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLSM charges 0.82% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $82 vs $3 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLSM currently yields 0.79% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CLSM and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLSM or VTI?
CLSM has an expense ratio of 0.82% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $79 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CLSM or VTI?
Over the past year CLSM returned +24.69% vs +21.39% for VTI, so CLSM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), CLSM annualized +3.63% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CLSM or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.4% for CLSM. Worst drawdown: CLSM -27.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CLSM and VTI?
CLSM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CLSM and VTI?
CLSM and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CLSM or VTI?
CLSM yields 0.79% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.