CLSM vs VXUS
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLSM | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.82% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $94M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.76% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +18.59% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.16% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.73% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | The Cabana Group, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 12, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CLSM vs VXUS Performance
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) is a ETF from The Cabana Group, LLC and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CLSM returned +26.16% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, CLSM is up 18.59% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, CLSM compounded at +13.28% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +3.73% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.5% for CLSM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.8% for CLSM and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLSM charges 0.82% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $82 vs $5 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLSM currently yields 0.76% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CLSM and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7866 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLSM or VXUS?
CLSM has an expense ratio of 0.82% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CLSM or VXUS?
Over the past year CLSM returned +26.16% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), CLSM annualized +3.87% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CLSM or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.5% for CLSM. Worst drawdown: CLSM -27.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CLSM and VXUS?
CLSM and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CLSM and VXUS?
CLSM and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7866 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CLSM or VXUS?
CLSM yields 0.76% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.