CMDY vs VTI
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CMDY delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CMDY | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $627M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.67% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 83 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +24.11% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +37.35% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.82% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.34% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
CMDY vs VTI Performance
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CMDY returned +37.35% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, CMDY is up 24.11% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, CMDY compounded at +13.82% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.34% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +7.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 13.8% for CMDY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.2% for CMDY and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CMDY charges 0.28% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $3 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CMDY currently yields 10.67% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CMDY and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CMDY or VTI?
CMDY has an expense ratio of 0.28% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $25 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CMDY or VTI?
Over the past year CMDY returned +37.35% vs +22.39% for VTI, so CMDY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), CMDY annualized +7.84% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CMDY or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 13.8% for CMDY. Worst drawdown: CMDY -31.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CMDY and VTI?
CMDY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CMDY and VTI?
CMDY and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CMDY or VTI?
CMDY yields 10.67% while VTI yields 1.07%, so CMDY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.