CMDY vs VYM
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CMDY delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CMDY | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $627M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.67% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 83 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +24.11% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +37.35% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.82% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.34% | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
CMDY vs VYM Performance
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CMDY returned +37.35% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, CMDY is up 24.11% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, CMDY compounded at +13.82% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +10.34% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, CMDY has the edge at +7.84% annualized vs +7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.8% for CMDY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.2% for CMDY and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CMDY charges 0.28% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $4 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CMDY currently yields 10.67% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
CMDY and VYM share 0 holdings out of 604 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CMDY or VYM?
CMDY has an expense ratio of 0.28% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CMDY or VYM?
Over the past year CMDY returned +37.35% vs +24.43% for VYM, so CMDY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), CMDY annualized +7.84% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CMDY or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.8% for CMDY. Worst drawdown: CMDY -31.2% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both CMDY and VYM?
CMDY and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CMDY and VYM?
CMDY and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 604 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CMDY or VYM?
CMDY yields 10.67% while VYM yields 2.24%, so CMDY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.