CPSF vs VXUS
CPSF vs VXUS
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - February vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CPSF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $34M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +3.40% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.77% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Calamos Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CPSF vs VXUS Performance
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - February (CPSF) is a ETF from Calamos Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CPSF returned +6.77% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, CPSF is up 3.40% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 2.3% for CPSF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.9% for CPSF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CPSF charges 0.69% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $5 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CPSF currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CPSF or VXUS?
CPSF has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $64 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CPSF or VXUS?
Over the past year CPSF returned +6.77% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CPSF annualized +6.43% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CPSF or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 2.3% for CPSF. Worst drawdown: CPSF -2.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CPSF and VXUS?
CPSF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, CPSF or VXUS?
CPSF yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.