CRBN vs VXUS
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, CRBN or VXUS?
Each has led over a different period.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. CRBN led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VXUS over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRBN | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $1.2B | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.97% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 1,123 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +10.66% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.38% | +22.44%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.13%Best | +19.44% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.52%Best | +8.82% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3646.9% | 14.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.1%Best | -39.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,489Best | $15,260 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 8, 2014 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 28, 2013 to Sep 10, 2026 (13 years).
CRBN vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CRBN vs VXUS Performance
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF (CRBN) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CRBN returned +17.38% while VXUS returned +22.44%. Year to date, CRBN is up 10.66% versus a gain of 13.35% for VXUS.
Over three years, CRBN compounded at +20.13% per year against +19.44% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +10.52% and +8.82% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, CRBN has the edge at +57.49% annualized vs +6.08%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRBN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 3646.9% compared with 14.5% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.1% for CRBN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.10. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRBN charges 0.20% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $5 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRBN currently yields 1.97% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 21.0% of CRBN's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
CRBN and VXUS share little of their money.
397 positions in common, counted across the 976 positions we hold weights for in CRBN and 8,091 in VXUS, against full books of 1,123 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CRBN | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 000660:KRSk Hynix | 0.86% | 2.17% | 1.31% |
| ASML:ASAsml Holding N.V. | 0.74% | 1.70% | 0.96% |
| HSBA:LNHsbc Holdings Plc | 0.35% | 0.72% | 0.37% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag Chf0.49 (Regd) | 0.33% | 0.65% | 0.32% |
| RY:CARoyal Bank of Canada | 0.31% | 0.64% | 0.33% |
| AZN:LNAstrazeneca Plc | 0.27% | 0.62% | 0.35% |
| SIE:SGSiemens Ag | 0.22% | 0.52% | 0.30% |
| NESN:SMNestle Sa | 0.13% | 0.59% | 0.46% |
| 9988:HKAlibaba Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares | 0.21% | 0.49% | 0.28% |
| SAN:MABanco Santander S.a. | 0.22% | 0.45% | 0.23% |
21.0% of CRBN is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRBN or VXUS?
CRBN has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CRBN or VXUS?
Over the past year CRBN returned +17.38% vs +22.44% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), CRBN annualized +57.49% vs +6.08% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CRBN or VXUS?
CRBN has been the more volatile fund at 3646.9% annualized versus 14.5% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: CRBN -33.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CRBN and VXUS?
CRBN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.10, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CRBN and VXUS?
At least 21.0% of CRBN's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 397 positions in common, counted across the 976 positions we hold weights for in CRBN and 8,091 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRBN or VXUS?
CRBN yields 1.97% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than CRBN?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. CRBN led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VXUS over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.