CRBN vs VXUS
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRBN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $1.1B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.02% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 1,123 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +12.30% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.48% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.69% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.02% | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3659.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 8, 2014 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CRBN vs VXUS Performance
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF (CRBN) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CRBN returned +22.48% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, CRBN is up 12.30% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Over three years, CRBN compounded at +20.69% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +11.02% and +9.14% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, CRBN has the edge at +58.14% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRBN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 3659.8% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.1% for CRBN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.10. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRBN charges 0.20% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $5 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRBN currently yields 2.02% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CRBN and VXUS share 394 holdings out of 8443 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRBN or VXUS?
CRBN has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CRBN or VXUS?
Over the past year CRBN returned +22.48% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), CRBN annualized +58.14% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CRBN or VXUS?
CRBN has been the more volatile fund at 3659.8% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: CRBN -33.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CRBN and VXUS?
CRBN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.10, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CRBN and VXUS?
CRBN and VXUS share 394 common holdings with a 15.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8443 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRBN or VXUS?
CRBN yields 2.02% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.