CRIB vs IVV

CRIB vs IVV

Which is better, CRIB or IVV?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCRIBIVV
Expense Ratio0.49%0.03%Best
AUM$2M$876.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings96508
YTD Return-2.68%+12.51%Best
1Y Return-+17.57%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.95%
Top 10 Weight40.0%37.9%Best
Fund FamilyRussell InvestmentsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 22, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

CRIB vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

CRIB vs IVV Performance

Russell Investments Global Real Estate ETF (CRIB) is an ETF from Russell Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, CRIB is down 2.68% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CRIB charges 0.49% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRIB currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

CRIB already in IVV48.9%
IVV already in CRIB1.5%

48.9% of CRIB's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.5% of IVV's money is in holdings CRIB also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

18 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in CRIB and 505 in IVV, against full books of 96 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 478 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for CRIB (97.9% of the fund), and 22 for CRIB that do not appear in IVV (16.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CRIBWeight in IVVDifference
WELLWelltower Inc9.58%0.25%9.33%
EQIXEquinix, Inc.6.53%0.16%6.37%
PLDPrologis Inc5.56%0.20%5.36%
PSAPublic Storage3.16%0.08%3.08%
SPGSimon Property Group Inc3.06%0.11%2.95%
ESSEssex Property Trust Inc.2.73%0.03%2.70%
DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc.2.39%0.10%2.29%
EQREquity Residential2.42%0.03%2.39%
VTRVentas, Inc.2.04%0.07%1.97%
INVHInvitation Homes Inc1.70%0.03%1.67%

48.9% of CRIB is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

CRIBIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CRIB or IVV?

CRIB has an expense ratio of 0.49% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between CRIB and IVV?

48.9% of CRIB's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.5% of IVV's is in holdings CRIB also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in CRIB and 505 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, CRIB or IVV?

CRIB yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than CRIB?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.