CRWU vs IVV
T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRWU | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $42M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.48% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -38.50% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | -68.74% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 172.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -94.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 25, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
CRWU vs IVV Performance
T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) is a ETF from REX Shares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CRWU returned -68.74% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, CRWU is down 38.50% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRWU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 172.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.3% for CRWU and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRWU charges 1.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRWU currently yields 15.48% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CRWU and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRWU or IVV?
CRWU has an expense ratio of 1.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CRWU or IVV?
Over the past year CRWU returned -68.74% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CRWU annualized -81.61% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CRWU or IVV?
CRWU has been the more volatile fund at 172.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CRWU -94.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CRWU and IVV?
CRWU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CRWU and IVV?
CRWU and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRWU or IVV?
CRWU yields 15.48% while IVV yields 1.10%, so CRWU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.