CRWU vs VOO
T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRWU | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $42M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.48% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -35.73% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | -67.84% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 174.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -94.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 25, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CRWU vs VOO Performance
T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) is a ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CRWU returned -67.84% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, CRWU is down 35.73% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRWU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 174.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.3% for CRWU and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRWU charges 1.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRWU currently yields 15.48% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
CRWU and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRWU or VOO?
CRWU has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CRWU or VOO?
Over the past year CRWU returned -67.84% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CRWU annualized -80.92% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CRWU or VOO?
CRWU has been the more volatile fund at 174.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CRWU -94.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CRWU and VOO?
CRWU and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CRWU and VOO?
CRWU and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRWU or VOO?
CRWU yields 15.48% while VOO yields 1.08%, so CRWU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.