CRWU vs VYM
T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRWU | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $27M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.04% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -5.55% | +16.53% | |
| 1Y Return | -83.89% | +25.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 200.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -94.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 25, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
CRWU vs VYM Performance
T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) is a ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CRWU returned -83.89% while VYM returned +25.03%. Year to date, CRWU is down 5.55% versus a gain of 16.53% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRWU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 200.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.3% for CRWU and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRWU charges 1.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $4 annually, a gap of $146 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRWU currently yields 7.04% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
CRWU and VYM share 0 holdings out of 559 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRWU or VYM?
CRWU has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $146 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CRWU or VYM?
Over the past year CRWU returned -83.89% vs +25.03% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CRWU annualized -73.39% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CRWU or VYM?
CRWU has been the more volatile fund at 200.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CRWU -94.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both CRWU and VYM?
CRWU and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CRWU and VYM?
CRWU and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 559 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRWU or VYM?
CRWU yields 7.04% while VYM yields 2.86%, so CRWU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.