CSA vs VOO
VictoryShares US Small Cap Volatility Wtd ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSA | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $20M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.50% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 507 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -10.11% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.59% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.64% | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.99% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 7, 2015 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CSA vs VOO Performance
VictoryShares US Small Cap Volatility Wtd ETF (CSA) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CSA returned +0.59% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, CSA is down 10.11% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Over three years, CSA compounded at +3.64% per year against +22.09% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +15.99% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.50% annualized vs +8.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CSA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.4% for CSA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSA charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSA currently yields 1.50% against 1.08% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSA or VOO?
CSA has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSA or VOO?
Over the past year CSA returned +0.59% vs +20.69% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), CSA annualized +8.20% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSA or VOO?
CSA has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CSA -42.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CSA and VOO?
CSA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSA or VOO?
CSA yields 1.50% while VOO yields 1.08%, so CSA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.