CSF vs VOO
CSF vs VOO
VictoryShares US Discovery Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. CSF offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $26M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.51% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -6.58% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.25% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -2.15% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.06% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 31, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CSF vs VOO Performance
VictoryShares US Discovery Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CSF) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CSF returned +4.25% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, CSF is down 6.58% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, CSF compounded at -2.15% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.06% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +5.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CSF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.9% for CSF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSF charges 0.41% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $3 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSF currently yields 1.51% against 1.09% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSF or VOO?
CSF has an expense ratio of 0.41% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $38 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSF or VOO?
Over the past year CSF returned +4.25% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), CSF annualized +5.02% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSF or VOO?
CSF has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CSF -35.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CSF and VOO?
CSF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSF or VOO?
CSF yields 1.51% while VOO yields 1.09%, so CSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.