CSF vs VXUS
CSF vs VXUS
VictoryShares US Discovery Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $26M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.51% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -6.58% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.25% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -2.15% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.06% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 31, 2014 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CSF vs VXUS Performance
VictoryShares US Discovery Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CSF) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CSF returned +4.25% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, CSF is down 6.58% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, CSF compounded at -2.15% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +10.06% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, CSF has the edge at +5.02% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CSF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.9% for CSF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSF charges 0.41% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $5 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSF currently yields 1.51% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSF or VXUS?
CSF has an expense ratio of 0.41% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSF or VXUS?
Over the past year CSF returned +4.25% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), CSF annualized +5.02% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSF or VXUS?
CSF has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: CSF -35.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CSF and VXUS?
CSF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSF or VXUS?
CSF yields 1.51% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.