CSHI vs QQQ
NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSHI | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.83% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 22 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +3.23% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.03% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.41% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 0.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | NEOS | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 30, 2022 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CSHI vs QQQ Performance
NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) is a ETF from NEOS and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CSHI returned +5.03% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, CSHI is up 3.23% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, CSHI compounded at +5.41% per year against +25.96% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +5.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 0.4% for CSHI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.7% for CSHI and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSHI charges 0.38% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $18 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSHI currently yields 4.83% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CSHI and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSHI or QQQ?
CSHI has an expense ratio of 0.38% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSHI or QQQ?
Over the past year CSHI returned +5.03% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CSHI annualized +5.44% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSHI or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 0.4% for CSHI. Worst drawdown: CSHI -1.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CSHI and QQQ?
CSHI and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CSHI and QQQ?
CSHI and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSHI or QQQ?
CSHI yields 4.83% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so CSHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.