CSHI vs VYM
NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSHI | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.87% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 22 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +2.68% | +16.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.62% | +25.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.22% | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 0.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | NEOS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 30, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
CSHI vs VYM Performance
NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) is a ETF from NEOS and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CSHI returned +4.62% while VYM returned +25.03%. Year to date, CSHI is up 2.68% versus a gain of 16.53% for VYM.
Over three years, CSHI compounded at +5.22% per year against +18.54% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.10% annualized vs +5.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 0.6% for CSHI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.7% for CSHI and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSHI charges 0.39% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $4 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSHI currently yields 4.87% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
CSHI and VYM share 0 holdings out of 565 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSHI or VYM?
CSHI has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSHI or VYM?
Over the past year CSHI returned +4.62% vs +25.03% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CSHI annualized +5.33% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSHI or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 0.6% for CSHI. Worst drawdown: CSHI -1.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both CSHI and VYM?
CSHI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CSHI and VYM?
CSHI and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 565 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSHI or VYM?
CSHI yields 4.87% while VYM yields 2.86%, so CSHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.