CSPF vs VTI
Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSPF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $316M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.78% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 320 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +2.71% | +13.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.95% | +21.07% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.71% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -3.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
CSPF vs VTI Performance
Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CSPF returned +4.95% while VTI returned +21.07%. Year to date, CSPF is up 2.71% versus a gain of 13.12% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 3.3% for CSPF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.1% for CSPF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSPF charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSPF currently yields 5.78% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CSPF and VTI share 4 holdings out of 2921 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSPF or VTI?
CSPF has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSPF or VTI?
Over the past year CSPF returned +4.95% vs +21.07% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CSPF annualized +7.10% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSPF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 3.3% for CSPF. Worst drawdown: CSPF -3.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CSPF and VTI?
CSPF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CSPF and VTI?
CSPF and VTI share 4 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2921 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSPF or VTI?
CSPF yields 5.78% while VTI yields 1.07%, so CSPF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.