CSPF vs VXUS
Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSPF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $297M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.71% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 266 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +3.25% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.58% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -3.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CSPF vs VXUS Performance
Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CSPF returned +6.58% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, CSPF is up 3.25% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 3.3% for CSPF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.1% for CSPF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSPF charges 0.59% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $5 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSPF currently yields 5.71% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CSPF and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7992 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSPF or VXUS?
CSPF has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSPF or VXUS?
Over the past year CSPF returned +6.58% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CSPF annualized +7.75% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSPF or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 3.3% for CSPF. Worst drawdown: CSPF -3.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CSPF and VXUS?
CSPF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CSPF and VXUS?
CSPF and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7992 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSPF or VXUS?
CSPF yields 5.71% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so CSPF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.