CSSD vs VOO
Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CSSD or VOO?
Short Term Mid Quality against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSSD | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $61M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.60% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 174 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +2.36% | +11.48%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.94% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.66% |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Short Term Mid Quality | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CSSD vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CSSD vs VOO Performance
Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, CSSD is up 2.36% versus a gain of 11.48% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSSD charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSSD currently yields 4.60% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.5% of VOO's money is in holdings CSSD also owns.
Stated as a floor: for CSSD, our book for it covers 48.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
3 positions in common, counted across the 91 positions we hold weights for in CSSD and 494 in VOO, against full books of 174 and 509.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CSSD and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSSD or VOO?
CSSD has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSSD or VOO?
CSSD yields 4.60% while VOO yields 1.04%, so CSSD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than CSSD?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.